Ng. Hatsopoulos et al., HYSTERESIS REDUCTION IN PROPRIOCEPTION USING PRESYNAPTIC SHUNTING INHIBITION, Journal of neurophysiology, 73(3), 1995, pp. 1031-1042
1. The tonic responses of angular-position-sensitive afferents in the
metathoracic chordontal organ of the locust leg exhibit much hysteresi
s. For a given joint angle, the ratio of an afferent's tonic firing ra
te after extension to its firing rate after flexion (or vice versa) is
typically between 1.2:1 and 3:1 but can be as large as 10:1. Spiking
local interneurons, that receive direct inputs from these afferents, c
an, by contrast, exhibit much less hysteresis (between 1.1:1 and 1.2:1
). We tested the hypothesis that presynaptic inhibitory interactions b
etween afferent axons reduces the hysteresis of postsynaptic interneur
ons by acting as an automatic gain control mechanism. 2. We used two k
inds of neural models to test this hypothesis: 1) an abstract nonspiki
ng neural model in which a multiplicative, shunting term reduced the '
'firing rate'' of the afferent and 2) a more realistic compartmental m
odel in which shunting inhibition presynaptically attenuated the ampli
tude of the action potentials reaching the afferent terminals. 3. The
abstract neural model demonstrated the automatic gain control capabili
ty of a network of laterally inhibited afferent units. A postsynaptic
unit, which was connected to the competitive network of afferents, cod
ed for joint angle without saturating as the strength of the afferent
input increased by two orders of magnitude. This was possible because
shunting inhibition exactly balanced the increase in the excitatory in
put. This compensatory mechanism required the sum of the excitatory an
d inhibitory conductances to be much larger than the leak conductance.
This requirement suggested a graded weighting scheme in which the aff
erent recruited first (i.e., at a small joint angle) received the larg
est inhibition from each of the other afferents because of the lack of
active neighbors, and the afferent recruited last (i.e., at a large j
oint angle) received the least inhibition because all the other affere
nts were active. 4. The compartmental model demonstrated that presynap
tic shunting inhibition between afferents could decrease the average s
ynaptic conductance caused by the afferents onto the spiking interneur
on, thereby counterbalancing the afferents' large average firing rates
after movements in the preferred direction. Therefore the total posts
ynaptic input per unit time did not differ much between the preferred
and nonpreferred directions. Hysteresis in the response of the modeled
postsynaptic interneuron was thereby reduced from ratios as high as 2
.5:1 to <1:1. In addition, shunting inhibition prevented the modeled i
nterneuron From saturating and front failing to fire. A local, lateral
interaction shunting scheme in which an afferent is shunted only by i
ts nearest neighbors (i.e., those afferents that are recruited at simi
lar angles) reduced hysteresis sis and maintained the dynamic range of
the spiking interneuron better than a global interaction scheme, wher
e all afferents are presynaptically connected to each other. 5. The re
sults of these simulations demonstrate a potential role for the establ
ished presynaptic inhibitory interactions between proprioceptive affer
ent terminals. In addition, these results allow us to make several tes
table predictions. First, if lateral shunting inhibition between affer
ent terminals can be selectively blocked pharma cologically, hysteresi
s in the tonic response of the spiking local interneuron should increa
se. Second, presynaptic shunting inhibition should exist between affer
ents with similar recruitment thresholds, if not between all afferents
that innervate the same spiking interneuron. Finally, we should expec
t a graded synaptic weighting scheme such that presynaptic inhibitory
conductances are greater onto the afferents that are recruited early.