At its 50th anniversary, the UN is facing new challenges due to change
s in the international system. Internal conflicts have replaced inter-
state conflicts as the main threat to international society. The autho
r indicates that absence of state aggression signifies that the UN is
finally reaching the original aim of its charter. However, this still
leaves the organisation without comprehensive instruments for solving
or managing new threats. The international community has developed fro
m a system with states as the only legitimate actors, to a diversified
picture where actors and forces like NGOs, internal political or ethn
ic groups, regional organisations, the media, and a globalised world e
conomy set conditions for an international agenda. The prospects for a
n effective response to global problems will depend on a variety of fa
ctors. A crucial question is whether it is possible to develop a commo
n basis of values and definition of problems, in a world where central
ising and fragmenting forces clash (e.g. the question of human rights)
. Another question is whether the UN, regional organisations and NGOs
are able to overcome institutional barriers and develop comprehensive
systems of co-operation in complex conflicts and other emergency situa
tions. Despite its bureaucratic reputation, the UN system has shown fl
exibility and creativity that should be further nurtured. The author a
rgues that the UN will be a more important organisation in the future.
But instead of taking a radical new direction, reforms are likely to
happen step by step, a gradual adaptation of the organisation to the n
ew challenges.