A new complexity has emerged in the international management of humani
tarian crises. The article presents old and new actors in the humanita
rian field, and the growing intricacy of their interaction. The increa
sing interface between the UN's political/military and humanitarian ac
tivity underlines the need for a sharper distinction between the human
itarian role on the one hand, and the political/military aspect on the
other. In this respect the author recommends that the UN clarifies it
s mandates and seeks to avoid overlapping mandates and uncovered areas
between mandates. With the increasing participation of NGOs in UN ope
rations, the UN should also define its role in this context. The autho
r argues that the UN, as the main actor, should concentrate on plannin
g and overall management and leave the implementation to NGOs and othe
r organisations. This would imply a strengthening of flexible network
structures. The author suggests that the UN should define a humanitari
an agenda as a parallel to the Secretary-General's 'An Agenda for Peac
e'.