C. Bombardier et al., COMPARISON OF A GENERIC AND A DISEASE-SPECIFIC MEASURE OF PAIN AND PHYSICAL FUNCTION AFTER KNEE REPLACEMENT SURGERY, Medical care, 33(4), 1995, pp. 131-144
Generic and disease-specific health status instruments are commonly us
ed to assess patients' outcomes. The hypothesis that they measure dist
inct but complementary aspects of patients' quality of life was tested
using a sample of patients aged 67 to 99 years who had undergone knee
replacement surgery 2 to 7 years previously. Patients' scores on a ge
neric health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) measure, the SF-36, were
compared to those of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WO
MAC) Osteoarthritis Index; the WOMAC was developed specifically for pa
tients with lower extremity arthritis, whereas the SF-36 is aimed at a
ll conditions. A stratified sample of 1,750 Medicare beneficiaries was
surveyed and an overall response rate of 80.3% achieved, resulting in
1;193 usable surveys (after adjustment for ineligible, incapacitated
and deceased individuals). The distribution of scores on the three dim
ensions common to both instruments (i.e., pain, physical function, and
overall score) showed consistently higher scores on the WOMAC, on a s
cale of 0 (worst) to 100 (best), than on the SF-36, indicating less di
sability from arthritis than from other conditions after knee surgery
in this elderly population. Statistically significant differences in t
he number of people with perfectly healthy scores were detected betwee
n the instruments; with regard to pain, 32.2% of the sample reported n
o pain due to arthritis on the WOMAC, compared with only 13.6% reporti
ng no pain due to any conditions on the SF-36. The figures for physica
l function and overall score were 9.6% versus 1.4%, and 6.9% versus 0.
2%, respectively Examination for discriminant validity showed that the
scores on the two scales followed hypothesized patterns: the WOMAC di
scriminated better among subjects with varying severity of knee proble
ms, whereas the SF-36 discriminated better among subjects with varying
levels of self-reported health status and comorbidity. The results of
this study support the inclusion of both a generic and a disease-spec
ific HRQOL measure to assess patient outcomes fully.