This study addresses the following questions: (1) what are the essenti
al components of a medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) pretreatment eval
uation?; (2) do paraphilic men treated with MPA (Depo-Provera) report
a lowering of both deviant and nondeviant sexual drive and activities?
; (3) is behavioral improvement associated with testosterone level red
uctions?; and (4) what significant side effects are associated with MP
A treatment? A total of 29 paraphilic men who underwent a comprehensiv
e psychiatric, medical, and legal evaluation and were eligible for tre
atment with MPA were followed naturalistically white receiving concurr
ent MPA and group therapy. The principal outcome measures were data ob
tained from a weekly self-reported psychosexual inventory that quantif
ied five dimensions of deviant and nondeviant sexual activities and te
stosterone levels that were drawn pretreatment and after three and six
months of MPA. Self-reported data were analyzed by nonparametric meth
ods. Because MPA's effectiveness is evident early in treatment, we rep
ort on data from the first six months. Subjects reported a differentia
l rate of suppression of sexual activities, a median of up to two week
s for deviant and 2 to 10 weeks for nondeviant behaviors (p less than
or equal to .01 for each of the five dimensions). Testosterone levels
suppressed to less than 0.5 ng per milliliter for all but two subjects
at three months and for all at six months. Recidivism was reported fo
r one subject. Except for one subject who developed pulmonary emboli,
no major medical problems were encountered. MPA safely and effectively
reduced sex drive, controlled deviant sexual impulses and behavior, a
nd lowered the testosterone levels of these paraphilic men during the
first six months of treatment. However, the relative rapidity and comp
leteness of the response raises questions regarding possible distortio
ns in self-reported sexual activities. This should alert the practicin
g clinician to consider the use of collateral sources of information i
n interpreting treatment outcome for patients with paraphilic behavior
s. Also, longer follow-up periods are required for monitoring treatmen
t efficacy.