WHY VOTERS VOTE FOR INCUMBENTS BUT AGAINST INCUMBENCY - A RATIONAL CHOICE EXPLANATION

Citation
D. Friedman et D. Wittman, WHY VOTERS VOTE FOR INCUMBENTS BUT AGAINST INCUMBENCY - A RATIONAL CHOICE EXPLANATION, Journal of public economics, 57(1), 1995, pp. 67-83
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Economics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00472727
Volume
57
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
67 - 83
Database
ISI
SICI code
0047-2727(1995)57:1<67:WVVFIB>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
In recent elections, voters supported initiatives to limit the number of terms that their representatives may serve, yet at the same time, o verwhelmingly re-elected their incumbents. We provide a theoretical ex planation for this and other puzzles associated with voting on term li mitations. The pattern of voting on term limits can be explained by th e desire to redistribute power from one party to another, from one bra nch of government to another, and from districts with long-term incumb ents to districts whose representatives have served only for a short t ime span. We test these hypotheses by looking at voting patters on Cal ifornia Proposition 140 and the vote on the 22nd Amendment with genera lly positive results.