Large-scale diet-related epidemiological work relies on the quality of
self-reported food consumption. As this epidemiological work forms th
e basis of knowledge of the relationship of diet to disease, it is ess
ential that the self-reports of personal diet are understood. It is ge
nerally accepted that foods consumed are under-reported, even over as
short a period as 24 hours. However, little is known about the potenti
al systematic biases that may affect the quality of self-reported food
intake. The current study examines the accuracy of memories of the co
nsumption of snack foods eaten in the previous 24 hours and investigat
es factors that may bias these memories. All participants had previous
ly participated in a randomized intervention trial to lower dietary fa
t intake to 20 per cent of calories. Fifty-six women (intervention and
control) tasted eight snack foods in a laboratory setting. They were
telephoned a day later and asked to recall the type of snack foods (M&
Ms, pretzels, etc.) and the quantity of each food they consumed. Subje
cts in general under-reported the number of selections and the quantit
y of each item consumed. Women who accurately recalled an item, report
ed more liking for that item compared to those who forgot the item. Wo
men currently maintaining a low-fat diet were less accurate in their r
ecall of low-fat items than women on a high-fat diet. Low-fat eaters,
however, may be slightly better at recalling how much of certain foods
they consumed. Results have implications for survey research and unde
rstanding the psychological influences on reports of food consumption
used in large-scale diet studies.