Ld. Paxton et al., PREVENTION OF NAUSEA AND VOMITING AFTER DAY-CASE GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPY - A COMPARISON OF ONDANSETRON, DROPERIDOL, METOCLOPRAMIDE AND PLACEBO, Anaesthesia, 50(5), 1995, pp. 403-406
We have compared the efficacy of ondansetron, metoclopramide, droperid
ol and placebo in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
in 118 day stay patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological proced
ures. All received a standardised general anaesthetic of fentanyl, pro
pofol, nitrous oxide in oxygen and isoflurane. Three to five min befor
e induction of anaesthesia, patients were allocated to receive ondanse
tron 4 mg, metoclopramide 10 mg, droperidol 1 mg or placebo in a rando
mised, double-blind manner. Visual analogue scores for nausea, the inc
idence of emetic episodes, and analgesic and antiemetic consumption we
re recorded for 48 h postoperatively. The scores for nausea were signi
ficantly lower in the ondansetron group (p < 0.01) compared with the o
ther three groups at 1, 2 and 4 h after operation; thereafter there wa
s no difference. The incidence of emesis was lower (p = 0.063) and tim
e to first oral fluids was shorter (p < 0.05) in the ondansetron group
. Oral analgesic requirements were significantly greater in the ondans
etron group over the 48 h study period. Two patients, one each in the
placebo and metoclopramide groups, had to remain in hospital overnight
because of persistent emetic symptoms.