Td. Evans et al., RELIGION AND CRIME REEXAMINED - THE IMPACT OF RELIGION, SECULAR CONTROLS, AND SOCIAL ECOLOGY ON ADULT CRIMINALITY, Criminology, 33(2), 1995, pp. 195-224
Since Hirschi and Stark's (1969) surprising failure to find religious
(''hellfire'') effects on delinquency, subsequent research has general
ly revealed an inverse relationship between religiosity and various fo
rms of deviance, delinquency, and crime. The complexity of the relatio
nship and conditions under which it holds, however, continue to be deb
ated. Although a few researchers have found that religion's influence
is noncontingent, most have found support-especially among youths-for
effects that vary by denomination, type of offense, and social and/or
religious context. More recently the relationship has been reported as
spurious when relevant secular controls are included. Our research at
tempts to resolve these issues by testing the religion-crime relations
hip in models with a comprehensive crime measure and three separate di
mensions of religiosity. We also control far secular constraints, reli
gious networks, and social ecology. We found that, among our religiosi
ty measures, participation in religious activities was a persistent an
d noncontingent inhibiter of adult crime.