EFFECTS OF DIAGNOSIS, LATERALITY, AND GENDER ON BRAIN MORPHOLOGY IN SCHIZOPHRENIA

Citation
M. Flaum et al., EFFECTS OF DIAGNOSIS, LATERALITY, AND GENDER ON BRAIN MORPHOLOGY IN SCHIZOPHRENIA, The American journal of psychiatry, 152(5), 1995, pp. 704-714
Citations number
64
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Psychiatry
ISSN journal
0002953X
Volume
152
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
704 - 714
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-953X(1995)152:5<704:EODLAG>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Objective: Structural neuroimaging and neuropathological studies have demonstrated a variety of aspects of brain morphology that appear to d istinguish schizophrenic patients from comparison subjects (diagnostic effects), a predominance of left-sided pathology (laterality effects) , and a greater likelihood of brain abnormality among males (gender ef fects). However, findings have been inconsistent across studies, perha ps reflecting limited power due to small study group sizes. The goal o f this study was to examine diagnostic, laterality, and gender effects of brain morphology as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in a la rge, carefully evaluated group of schizophrenic and comparison subject s. Method: One hundred two patients with schizophrenia (DSM-III-R) (70 men and 32 women) and 87 normal comparison subjects, chosen to be equ ivalent to the patients in terms of familial socioeconomic background, underwent magnetic resonance imaging with a 1.5-tesla scanner. All re gions of interest were outlined manually by an experienced technician on all slices in which they were visualized. Region of interest volume s were compared across groups, and age, sex, and stature were controll ed. Results: Schizophrenic patients were found to have larger lateral and third ventricles and smaller thalamic, hippocampal, and superior t emporal volumes than comparison subjects. No significant differences w ere demonstrated for intracranial, cerebral, cerebellar, temporal lobe , caudate nuclei, or temporal horn volumes. There were no significant Laterality by Diagnosis effects and no significant Gender by Diagnosis effects for any of the regions of interest. Conclusions: Many, but no t all, of the hypotheses informed by earlier studies regarding diagnos tic effects were confirmed, while hypotheses regarding gender and late rality interactions with diagnosis were not supported.