Dw. Wiersma et al., ALFALFA CULTIVAR PERFORMANCE WITH DIFFERING LEVELS OF RESISTANCE TO PHYTOPHTHORA AND APHANOMYCES ROOT ROTS, Journal of production agriculture, 8(2), 1995, pp. 259-264
Although Phytophthora root rot (Phytophthora medicaginis [Hansen and M
axwell]; PRR) and Aphanomyces root rot (Aphanomyces euteiches [Drechs]
; ARR) have been identified as serious diseases of alfalfa (Medicago s
ativa L.), research has not been conducted to determine what level of
resistance is required to adequately protect the crop. Alfalfa cultiva
rs with various levels of PRR and ARR resistance were evaluated for pl
ant stand and vigor during the seeding year in a naturally infested fi
eld at Marshfield, WI, over 3 yr (1990-1992). Plant stands of the susc
eptible cultivar Saranac averaged 50% less than the dual resistant ger
mplasm WAPH-1. In 1990, alfalfa stands were reduced from 8 plants/ft o
f row for the dual resistant germplasm to less than 2 plants/ft of row
for Saranac. Average vigor score (1 to 5 = best) for resistant lines
was 3.6 compared with 1.8 for susceptible cultivars. In a 1993 study a
t Marshfield, severe root rot stress occurred, resulting in yield incr
eases of 325% for cultivars having high resistance (HR) ratings for PR
R and ARR compared with the dual susceptible cultivars. Regression equ
ations relating level of PRR or ARR resistance and forage yield were d
eveloped from summary data of alfalfa cultivar evaluations conducted a
t 26 Wisconsin locations. Forage yield increased as the level of PRR r
esistance increased from 0 to 40% (susceptible [S] to resistant [R]).
Yields of cultivars increased linearly with increasing level of ARR re
sistance. These data verify that PRR and ARR are serious diseases, esp
ecially in wet soils. We recommend that farmers select cultivars class
ified as R or HR (> 30% resistance) for both PRR and ARR for adequate
crop protection and maximum forage productivity in Wisconsin.