ACUTE TREATMENT OF RECENT-ONSET ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION AND FLUTTER WITH A TAILORED DOSING REGIMEN OF INTRAVENOUS AMIODARONE - A RANDOMIZED, DIGOXIN-CONTROLLED STUDY
Zy. Hou et al., ACUTE TREATMENT OF RECENT-ONSET ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION AND FLUTTER WITH A TAILORED DOSING REGIMEN OF INTRAVENOUS AMIODARONE - A RANDOMIZED, DIGOXIN-CONTROLLED STUDY, European heart journal, 16(4), 1995, pp. 521-528
A 24 h intravenous dosing regimen of amiodarone was designed to reach
a peak plasma concentration at 1 h and to maintain the concentration a
bove a certain level during the infusion period. A randomized, open-la
bel, digoxin-controlled study was undertaken to observe the efficacy a
nd safety of the dosing regimen of amiodarone in treating recent-onset
, persistent atrial fibrillation and flutter with ventricular rates ab
ove 130 beats . min(-1). Fifty patients with a mean age of 70 +/- 7 (S
D) years were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either amiodar
one intravenously (n=26) or digoxin (n=24). Amiodarone HCl was infused
over 24 it according to the following regimen: 5 mg . min(-1) 3 mg .
min(-1), 1 mg . min(-1) and 0.5 mg . min(-1) for 1, 3, 6 and 14 h, res
pectively, for a 70-kg subject. Digoxin (0.013 mg . kg(-1)) was infuse
d in three divided doses, each dose 2 h apart and infused over 30 min.
The mean heart rates in the amiodarone group decreased significantly
from 157 +/- 20 beats . min(-1) to 122 +/- 25 beats . min(-1) after 1
h (P<0.05 vs baseline), and then decreased further to stabilize at 96
+/- 25 beats . min(-1) after 6 h (P<0.05). The digoxin group had fewer
dramatic alterations in heart rates, compared to the amiodarone group
, in the first 8 h (P<0.05, respectively). Maximum reduction was reach
ed only after gh. The amiodarone infusion was prematurely aborted in t
wo patients due to severe bradycardia and death after conversion in on
e patient and aggravation of heart failure in the other. Overall, 24 o
f 26 patients (92%) in the amiodarone group and 17 of 24 (71%) in the
digoxin group were restored to sinus rhythm within 24 h. The accumulat
ed rates of conversion over 24 h were significantly different between
the two groups (P=0.0048). Digoxin, while not as effective as amiodaro
ne in the treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation amd flutter, a
ppears to be safer. Therefore, we suggest the use of digoxin as the fi
rst line drug for the type of patients that formed the basis of the cu
rrent study and reserve amiodarone for refractory cases or those in wh
om digoxin is not suitable.