Jz. Hu et al., MAGIC-ANGLE-TURNING EXPERIMENTS FOR MEASURING CHEMICAL-SHIFT-TENSOR PRINCIPAL VALUES IN POWDERED SOLIDS, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series A, 113(2), 1995, pp. 210-222
The magic-angle-turning (MAT) technique introduced by Gan employs slow
(approximately 30 Hz) rotation of a powdered sample at the magic angl
e, in concert with pulses synchronized to 1/3 of the rotor period, to
obtain isotropic-shift information in one dimension of a 2D spectrum.
The other dimension displays a slow-spinning-sideband powder pattern w
hich, at the low rotor frequencies employed, resembles the stationary-
sample powder pattern. The MAT method is very effective for measuring
chemical-shift principal values in compounds where spectral overlap pr
ecludes the use of 1D methods. Previous MAT implementations are review
ed, and it is shown how a new phase-corrected MAT (PHORMAT) pulse sequ
ence overcomes many of their limitations. This new pulse sequence prod
uces a spinning-sideband-free isotropic-shift spectrum directly as a p
rojection onto the evolution axis with no spectral shearing. Only two
purging operations are employed, resulting in a higher signal-to-noise
ratio. Pure absorption-absorption-phased 2D spectra are produced. Fla
t 2D baseplanes result from an echo sequence which delays acquisition
until after probe ring down and receiver recovery. The technique used
for synchronizing the pulses to 1/3 the rotor period without relying o
n absolute rotor-frequency stability is described. The PHORMAT spectru
m of methyl-alpha-D-glucopyranoside is presented. The data are analyze
d with an emphasis on the quantitative accuracy of the experiment in m
easuring chemical-shift-tensor principal values and determining the re
lative number of spins of each type present. The FID data from the spe
ctrometer acquisition are fitted with numerical simulations that emplo
y a banded-matrix method for calculating spinning-sideband amplitudes.
The chemical-shift principal values. measured in methyl-a-D-glucopyra
noside with the PHORMAT method, are compared with those from a single-
crystal determination of the full chemical-shift tensors. The two meas
urements differ by an RMS-average distance of only 0.57 ppm. (C) 1995
Academic Press, Inc.