Mz. Fan et al., VARIABILITY OF APPARENT ILEAL AMINO-ACID DIGESTIBILITY IN CANOLA-MEALFOR GROWING-FINISHING PIGS, Canadian journal of animal science, 76(4), 1996, pp. 563-569
Studies were conducted with six barrows, average initial body weight 3
2.5 kg, fitted with a T-cannula at the distal ileum, to determine some
of the factors responsible for the variability in apparent ileal dige
stibility values of amino acids (AA) in canola meal. The barrows were
fed six corn starch-based diets, formulated to contain 18.0% crude pro
tein (CP) on a dry matter (DM) basis from six canola meal samples, acc
ording to a 6 x 6 Latin square design. Chromic oxide (0.3%) was used a
s a digestibility marker. The pigs were fed twice daily, at 08:00 and
20:00 h. The dietary allowance was 1600 g d(-1). Each experimental per
iod consisted of 8 d. Ileal digesta were collected, at 2-h intervals,
for a total of 24 h from 08:00 on day 6 to 08:00 h on day 8. With the
exception of proline, there were differences (P < 0.05) in the apparen
t ileal digestibility values of all AA among the six canola meal sampl
es. Of the indispensable AA in canola meal, the digestibility values o
f arginine, histidine, and methionine were relatively high, ranging fr
om 79.4 to 84.4, from 76.5 to 81.0%, and from 77.3 to 82.4%, respectiv
ely, while the digestibility values of threonine and tryptophan were r
elatively low, ranging from 59.7 to 66.5 and from 61.7 to 67.5%, respe
ctively. Furthermore, with the exception of arginine, the digestibilit
y values of the indispensable PLA were negatively correlated (P < 0.05
) with the neutral-detergent fiber (NDF) content in canola meal. In ad
dition, with the exception of threonine, tryptophan and valine, the di
gestibility values of the indispensable AA were positively correlated
(P < 0.05) with their respective dietary levels. In conclusion, measur
ed with the ileal analysis method, there were differences (P < 0.05) i
n the digestibility values of the majority of AA among the canola meal
samples. Differences in NDF content were mainly responsible for the v
ariation. In addition, differences in the dietary levels of most AA al
so contributed, in part, to the variation of AA digestibility values.