CHROMATOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF MINOR HEMOGLOBINS - CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF HEMOGLOBIN A(1D), COMPARISON WITH HEMOGLOBIN A(1C), AND POSSIBLEINTERFERENCES
E. Bisse et al., CHROMATOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF MINOR HEMOGLOBINS - CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF HEMOGLOBIN A(1D), COMPARISON WITH HEMOGLOBIN A(1C), AND POSSIBLEINTERFERENCES, Clinical chemistry, 41(5), 1995, pp. 658-663
Using an HPLC procedure, we evaluated > 10 minor hemoglobins (Hbs) in
healthy adults, individuals on longterm aspirin therapy, diabetic subj
ects, and uremic patients. Hb A(1c) and Hb A(1d3) were the most abunda
nt and important minor Hb components, respectively, accounting for 4.1
0% +/- 0.50% and 3.46% +/- 0.43% of total Hb in 361 healthy subjects.
Acetylated Hb A was a potential interferent in the measurement of Hb A
(1c). The amounts of both Hb A(1d3) and Hb A(1carb) were significantly
increased in uremic patients, indicating that these Hb adducts may be
carbamylated. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.69, P < 0.00
01) between the amounts of Hb A(1d3) and plasma urea in uremic patient
s. Nonuremic subjects were clearly separated from uremic patients with
regard to the Hb A(1d3) content of their total Hb. Our data suggest t
hat Hb A(1d3) is useful for assessment of the uremic state and that th
e combination of Hb A(1c) and Hb A(1d3) could be well-suited for simul
taneous control of carbohydrate and urea metabolism.