CHROMATOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF MINOR HEMOGLOBINS - CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF HEMOGLOBIN A(1D), COMPARISON WITH HEMOGLOBIN A(1C), AND POSSIBLEINTERFERENCES

Citation
E. Bisse et al., CHROMATOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF MINOR HEMOGLOBINS - CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE OF HEMOGLOBIN A(1D), COMPARISON WITH HEMOGLOBIN A(1C), AND POSSIBLEINTERFERENCES, Clinical chemistry, 41(5), 1995, pp. 658-663
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Medicinal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00099147
Volume
41
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
658 - 663
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-9147(1995)41:5<658:CEOMH->2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Using an HPLC procedure, we evaluated > 10 minor hemoglobins (Hbs) in healthy adults, individuals on longterm aspirin therapy, diabetic subj ects, and uremic patients. Hb A(1c) and Hb A(1d3) were the most abunda nt and important minor Hb components, respectively, accounting for 4.1 0% +/- 0.50% and 3.46% +/- 0.43% of total Hb in 361 healthy subjects. Acetylated Hb A was a potential interferent in the measurement of Hb A (1c). The amounts of both Hb A(1d3) and Hb A(1carb) were significantly increased in uremic patients, indicating that these Hb adducts may be carbamylated. There was a significant correlation (r = 0.69, P < 0.00 01) between the amounts of Hb A(1d3) and plasma urea in uremic patient s. Nonuremic subjects were clearly separated from uremic patients with regard to the Hb A(1d3) content of their total Hb. Our data suggest t hat Hb A(1d3) is useful for assessment of the uremic state and that th e combination of Hb A(1c) and Hb A(1d3) could be well-suited for simul taneous control of carbohydrate and urea metabolism.