A. Grigg et al., G-CSF STIMULATED DONOR GRANULOCYTE COLLECTIONS FOR PROPHYLAXIS AND THERAPY OF NEUTROPENIC SEPSIS, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 26(6), 1996, pp. 813-818
Background: The administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating facto
r (G-CSF) increases the granulocyte count in normal donors and enables
the collection of large numbers of mature myeloid cells by leukaphere
sis. This has potential value in the treatment of sepsis unresponsive
to antibiotics in patients with severe neutropenia. Aim: To evaluate t
he tolerability of granulocyte collections in normal donors receiving
G-CSF, the optimal method of collection and the clinical factors influ
encing the efficacy of granulocyte infusions. Methods: Analysis of the
outcome of 55 granulocyte collections from 26 donors for progressive
bacterial or fungal sepsis in neutropenic patients (n=8) or as prophyl
axis in patients with recent fungal infections undergoing allogeneic b
one marrow transplantation (BMT) (n=3). Results: G-CSF was well tolera
ted in most donors. Fatigue occurred commonly after the second collect
ion. The median WCC per 200-220 mt bag was 351x10(9)/L. Collections we
re optimised with the use of a sedimenting agent (dextran) and a deepe
ned interface setting on the cell separator. There was only a weak cor
relation between the number of granulocytes infused and the increment
in the patient, but levels were usually maintained greater than or equ
al to 0.5x10(9)/L for the next 24 hours. The infusions were successful
in three septic patients without multi-organ dysfunction and prophyla
ctically, in two patients with localised fungal infections undergoing
MET. The infusions were not beneficial in patients with septicaemia an
d established organ dysfunction or with extensive pulmonary aspergillo
sis. Conclusions: G-CSF mobilised granulocyte collections are feasible
and the preliminary evidence suggests that the infusion of these cell
s may be useful early in the prophylaxis or treatment of severe neutro
penic sepsis.