D. Wiersma et al., COSTS AND BENEFITS OF HOSPITAL AND DAY TREATMENT WITH COMMUNITY CARE OF AFFECTIVE AND SCHIZOPHRENIC DISORDERS, British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 1995, pp. 52-59
Background. A randomised controlled trial of day treatment with commun
ity care for patients with schizophrenic and affective disorders, refe
rred for in-patient psychiatric treatment, was conducted to evaluate p
atterns of treatment and the course of illness with its psychosocial c
onsequences over a period of two years. Method. Seventy patients, of w
hom 34 had affective and 36 had schizophrenic disorder, were assigned
to the experimental condition (day treatment with ambulatory and domic
iliary care), and 33 patients, of whom 16 had affective and 17 had sch
izophrenic disorder, were assigned to the control condition of standar
d clinical care. Results. Day treatment with community care was feasib
le for 40.6% of the affective patients and 33.3% of the schizophrenic
patients. The direct treatment costs of both disorders, based on numbe
rs of in- and day-patient days and out-patient contacts over two years
, appeared more or less the same. Patients benefited equally from day
treatment as from in-patient treatment, although there were some gains
in self-care and in functioning in the household among experimentals.
Although schizophrenics were socioeconomically worse off, and also su
ffered from more (severe) symptoms and social disabilities than the af
fective patients at entry into the study, they were similar at two yea
rs. This finding is unexpected, compared with other follow-up studies.
Extra cost for patients and families were not observed. Patients and
their families in the experimental condition were significantly more s
atisfied with the treatment. Experimental patients spent much more tim
e at home during admission, remained much less time in secluded wards,
and were more compliant with treatment. Conclusions. Day treatment co
uld be considered a cost-effective alternative to in-patient treatment
.