THE PHILADELPHIA SYSTEM - SOVEREIGNTY, ARMS-CONTROL, AND BALANCE OF POWER IN THE AMERICAN STATES-UNION, CIRCA 1787-1861

Authors
Citation
Dh. Deudney, THE PHILADELPHIA SYSTEM - SOVEREIGNTY, ARMS-CONTROL, AND BALANCE OF POWER IN THE AMERICAN STATES-UNION, CIRCA 1787-1861, International organization, 49(2), 1995, pp. 191-228
Citations number
192
Categorie Soggetti
International Relations
Journal title
ISSN journal
00208183
Volume
49
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
191 - 228
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-8183(1995)49:2<191:TPS-SA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican Version of liberal poli tical theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of international relations. Republican liberalism has a theory of securi ty that is superior to realism, because it addresses not only threats of war from other states but also the threat of despotism at home. In this view, a Hobson's choice between anarchy and hierarchy is not nece ssary because an intermediary structure, here dubbed ''negarchy,'' is also available. The American Union from 1787 until 1861 is a historica l example. This Philadelphian system was not a real state since, for e xample, the union did not enjoy a monopoly of legitimate violence. Yet neither was it a state system, since the American states lacked suffi cient autonomy. While it shared some features with the Westphalian sys tem such as balance of power, it differed fundamentally. Its origins o wed something to particular conditions of time and place, and the Amer ican Civil War ended this system. Yet close analysis indicates that it may have surprising relevance for the future of contemporary issues s uch as the European Union and nuclear governance.