Dh. Deudney, THE PHILADELPHIA SYSTEM - SOVEREIGNTY, ARMS-CONTROL, AND BALANCE OF POWER IN THE AMERICAN STATES-UNION, CIRCA 1787-1861, International organization, 49(2), 1995, pp. 191-228
A rediscovery of the long-forgotten republican Version of liberal poli
tical theory has arresting implications for the theory and practice of
international relations. Republican liberalism has a theory of securi
ty that is superior to realism, because it addresses not only threats
of war from other states but also the threat of despotism at home. In
this view, a Hobson's choice between anarchy and hierarchy is not nece
ssary because an intermediary structure, here dubbed ''negarchy,'' is
also available. The American Union from 1787 until 1861 is a historica
l example. This Philadelphian system was not a real state since, for e
xample, the union did not enjoy a monopoly of legitimate violence. Yet
neither was it a state system, since the American states lacked suffi
cient autonomy. While it shared some features with the Westphalian sys
tem such as balance of power, it differed fundamentally. Its origins o
wed something to particular conditions of time and place, and the Amer
ican Civil War ended this system. Yet close analysis indicates that it
may have surprising relevance for the future of contemporary issues s
uch as the European Union and nuclear governance.