Ef. Ellerbeck et al., QUALITY OF CARE FOR MEDICARE PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - A 4-STATE PILOT-STUDY FROM THE COOPERATIVE CARDIOVASCULAR PROJECT, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 273(19), 1995, pp. 1509-1514
Objective.-To develop and test indicators of the quality of care for p
atients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Design.-Retrospective
medical record review. Setting.-All acute care hospitals in Alabama, C
onnecticut, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Patients.-All hospitalizations for Me
dicare patients discharged with a principal diagnosis of AMI between J
une 1, 1992, and February 28, 1993, were identified (N=16 869). Main O
utcome Measure.-Percentage of patients receiving appropriate intervent
ions as defined by 11 quality-of-care indicators derived from clinical
practice guidelines that were modified and updated in consultation wi
th a national group of physicians and other health care professionals.
Results.-We abstracted data from 16 124 (96%) of the hospitalizations
, representing 14 108 primary hospitalizations and 2016 hospitalizatio
ns resulting from transfers. Potential exclusions to the use of standa
rd treatments in AMI care were common with 90% and 70% of patients hav
ing potential exclusions for thrombolytics and beta-blockers, respecti
vely. In cohorts of ''ideal candidates'' for specific interventions, 8
3% received aspirin, 69% received thrombolytics, and 70% received hepa
rin during the initial hospitalization; 77% received aspirin and 45% r
eceived beta-blockers at discharge. Conclusions.-These data demonstrat
e that many Medicare patients may not be ideal candidates for standard
AMI therapies, but these treatments are underused, even in the absenc
e of discernible contraindications. Hospitals and physicians who apply
these quality indicators to their practices are likely to find opport
unities for improvement.