MISCONCEPTIONS AND CONTROVERSIES REGARDING THE USE OF OPIOIDS IN CANCER PAIN

The WHO has created a Cancer Pain Relief Programme and developed guide lines for the treatment of cancer pain. Implementation of the analgesi c guidelines, assurance of drug availability (specifically opioids), e ducation of healthcare professionals, and designating cancer pain as a priority for all national cancer control programmes are the major goa ls. Recent studies of medical students, physicians, nurses and state m edical boards demonstrate a significant lack of knowledge with regard to the theoretical and practical understanding of the use of analgesic drugs, particularly opioids, in the management of cancer pain. Commun ication between physicians and patients about pain symptoms has also b een shown to be problematic. Limited availability of opioids, their ex cessive regulation, and the lack of use of alternatives to systemic an algesics also prevent adequate management. Although analgesic drug the rapy is the mainstay of treatment, opioid use remains a controversial issue. Some of the controversies include their role in the management of neuropathic pain, which has been suggested to be 'opioid-resistant' , as well as the choice of opioid drug. A third controversy is the rou te of administration. The impetus for the development of novel routes has come from the goals of maximising analgesia, minimising side effec ts, and providing convenient dosing schedules for patients who require parenteral administration. Other important controversial issues are t he development of tolerance and the relationship of pain management to patient requests for physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.