Il. Singh et al., AUTOMATION-INDUCED MONITORING INEFFICIENCY - ROLE OF DISPLAY LOCATION, International journal of human-computer studies, 46(1), 1997, pp. 17-30
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology,Ergonomics,"Computer Sciences","Controlo Theory & Cybernetics","Computer Science Cybernetics
Operators can be poor monitors of automation if they are engaged concu
rrently in other tasks. However, in previous studies of this phenomeno
n the automated task was always presented in the periphery, away from
the primary manual tasks that were centrally displayed. In this study
we examined whether centrally locating an automated task would boost m
onitoring performance during a flight-simulation task consisting of sy
stem monitoring, tracking and fuel resource management sub-tasks. Twel
ve nonpilot subjects were required to perform the tracking and fuel ma
nagement tasks manually while watching the automated system monitoring
task for occasional failures. The automation reliability was constant
at 87.5% for six subjects and variable (alternating between 87.5% and
56.25%) for the other six subjects. Each subject completed four 30 mi
n sessions over a period of 2 days. In each automation reliability con
dition the automation routine was disabled for the last 20 min of the
fourth session in order to simulate catastrophic automation failure (0
% reliability). Monitoring for automation failure was inefficient when
automation reliability was constant but not when it varied over time,
replicating previous results. Furthermore, there was no evidence of r
esource or speed accuracy trade-off between tasks. Thus, automation-in
duced failures of monitoring cannot be prevented by centrally locating
the automated task. (C) 1997 Academic Press Limited