This article focuses on the new market socialist literature published
in 1991-1995. Comparisons are made between the new and older models of
market socialism. Contributions to the new literature are critically
examined. It is argued that the new market socialism does not present
a viable alternative to modern democratic capitalism. The article also
discusses what some had believed to be the dilemma post-communist soc
ieties would face: market socialism or the restoration of capitalism.
In this connection: some of the transformation options are examined. C
opyright (C) 1996 The Regents of the University of California