RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOCALIZED CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE IN A LARGE METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL - CHANGING TRENDS OVER A 10-YEAR PERIOD (1984-1994)
Se. Litwiller et al., RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR LOCALIZED CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE IN A LARGE METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL - CHANGING TRENDS OVER A 10-YEAR PERIOD (1984-1994), Urology, 45(5), 1995, pp. 813-822
Objectives. To analyze changing trends in the surgical treatment for l
ocalized carcinoma of the prostate in a large metropolitan community h
ospital over a 10-year period from 1984 to 1994. Methods. The records
of all 428 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for localized
carcinoma of the prostate from January 1, 1984, to January 1, 1994, at
a large metropolitan community hospital (Baylor University Medical Ce
nter, Dallas, Tex) were retrieved and data abstracted in a predefined
computerized database by a urology resident who was not part of the pa
tient's surgical team. The abstracted data included attending surgeon,
date of surgery, patient's age, clinical stage at presentation and pa
thologic stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), perioperative events,
such as duration of surgery, blood loss, transfusion, duration of hos
pital stay, comorbidities according to the Charlson comorbidity index,
and others. The data were analyzed in regard to changes over the 10-y
ear period and stratified by a variety of parameters. Results. The num
ber of radical prostatectomies performed increased by fourfold from 19
84 to 1995. The distribution of clinical stage and the incidence of pa
thologic upstaging noted in the 428 cases were similar to other series
reported in the literature. The average age of patients decreased fro
m 67 to 63 years over the 10 years (average calculated in increments o
f 15 cases in ascending order). Similarly, over time the average durat
ion of surgery, average blood loss, average use of transfusion, and th
e average duration of hospital stay decreased. When the cases were gro
uped by individual attending surgeon, whose numerical surgical experie
nce during that time period ranged from 1 to 76 cases, no correlation
was noted between the numerical experience and these outcomes. Conclus
ions. As opposed to the national Medicare experience recently reported
by the Prostate Patients Outcome Research Team, the increase in the n
umber of cases performed was mostly due to patients under the age of 7
0 years, considered reasonable candidates for radical prostatectomy. I
ndependent of numerical experience of individual attending surgeons, d
uration of surgery, blood loss, transfusion rates, and duration of hos
pital stay decreased during this period. This might indicate a learnin
g effect due to continuing education, exchange of ideas, published tec
hnical improvements in the surgical procedure, and other factors, ulti
mately benefiting the patient by improving outcomes.