GENETIC-ANALYSIS OF HESSIAN FLY RESISTANCE IN 8 DURUM-WHEAT INTRODUCTIONS

Citation
Se. Cambron et al., GENETIC-ANALYSIS OF HESSIAN FLY RESISTANCE IN 8 DURUM-WHEAT INTRODUCTIONS, Crop science, 35(3), 1995, pp. 708-714
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
0011183X
Volume
35
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
708 - 714
Database
ISI
SICI code
0011-183X(1995)35:3<708:GOHFRI>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Breeding for resistance in wheat, Triticum spp L., to Hessian fly, May etiola destructor (Say), has been the most successful method of contro lling damage from this pest. New genes for resistance are needed becau se virulence evolves in Hessian fly populations. Progenies of selected plants of eight durum wheat, Triticum durum Desf., introductions were compared for expression of resistance to Hessian fly Biotype L at tem peratures of 19, 23, and 26 degrees C. Biotype L is currently the most virulent biotype identified. The eight introductions had been shown p reviously to be resistant to Biotypes C, D, E, and L. Ad tested plants of the eight introductions were resistant to Biotype L at 19 degrees C. At 23 degrees C, all plants of four of the introductions were resis tant, and four had from 88 to 98% resistant plants. At 26 degrees C, a ll plants of three introductions were resistant, whereas five introduc tions had from 78 to 95% resistant plants. From testcross analyses, re sistance in seven of the introductions appeared to be conferred by one , two, or three dominant or partially dominant independent genes. Resi stances of CI3146-6, CI3241-2, and CI7335-10 were different from genes H5, H9, H14, and H16 of tester stocks. The single gene resistance of CI3146-6 was different from genes for resistance in CI3241-2 and CI398 4-12. The two genes for resistance of CI7066-1 were different from H9 and the two genes of CI7041-3. Two lines, CI3170-2 and CI3146-6, appea red to base one gene in common.