From 1984 to 1993, 1,053 patients were admitted with aortic aneurysm (
AA) and 170 (15%) were not operated on. The most frequent reason for n
onoperative management was presumed technical inoperability. Survivals
for patients with thoracic, thoracoabdominal, and abdominal AA were c
omparable. No significant differences in survival for patients with di
ssecting and nondissecting AA were detected. In all, 132 patients (78%
) died and 78 (59%) of them died of rupture. Mean time to rupture was
1,300 +/- 8 days. Cumulative 5-year hazard of rupture for the dissecti
ng AA was twice that of the nondissecting (p < 0.001). Hazards of rupt
ure for type A and B dissections were comparable. Diameter of 6 cm or
greater was associated with a fivefold increase in cumulative hazard o
f rupture (p < 0.001). Diameter of AA, incidence of renal failure, and
arterial hypertension were predictive of mortality, whereas the first
two variables were predictive of rupture. In conclusion, because the
majority of patients in all subgroups died of rupture, all patients sh
ould be recognized as candidates for surgical treatment. Present data
justify aggressive approach to the patient with AA 6 cm or more in dia
meter and type A dissections. The results suggest that type B dissecti
ons may have a more favorable course if operated on, but a prospective
, randomized study is necessary to confirm this observation. We believ
e that older patients and those with a small aneurysm may benefit from
early, elective operation.