This paper distinguishes four major types of futility (physiological,
imminent demise, lethal condition, and qualitative) that have been adv
ocated in the literature either in a patient dependent or a patient in
dependent fashion. It proposes five criteria (precision, prospective,
social acceptability, significant number, and non-agreement) that any
definition of futility must satisfy if it is to serve as the basis for
unilaterally limiting futile care. It then argues that none of the de
finitions that have been advocated meet the criteria, primarily becaus
e their proponents have not paid sufficient attention to the problemat
ic nature of the data supporting the use of their definitions.