PHARMACOKINETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE THERAPEUTIC USE OF CARNITINE IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS

Authors
Citation
Ep. Brass, PHARMACOKINETIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE THERAPEUTIC USE OF CARNITINE IN HEMODIALYSIS-PATIENTS, Clinical therapeutics, 17(2), 1995, pp. 176-185
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
01492918
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
176 - 185
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(1995)17:2<176:PCFTTU>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Clinical observations have suggested that carnitine supplementation ma y be beneficial to a subset of patients receiving chronic hemodialysis . In the absence of definitive clinical trials, the clinician must dec ide for an individual patient whether a trial of carnitine therapy is justified. The institution of carnitine therapy is further complicated by the availability of oral and intravenous dosing forms and by the c ompound's complex pharmacokinetics. The oral systemic bioavailability of carnitine in normal subjects is 5% to 16%, with peak plasma carniti ne concentrations reached 2 to 6 hours after dosing. Carnitine is init ially distributed into extracellular water and then more slowly enters tissue compartments with complex kinetics. Elimination of carnitine i s through the urine or dialysate. Intravenous carnitine administration results in large peak plasma concentrations and assures systemic bioa vailability. Orally administered carnitine has been reported to have c linical efficacy in hemodialysis patients in doses of 2 to 4 g per day in divided doses. Intravenous carnitine has also been widely used in clinical trials in attempts to demonstrate efficacy in the hemodialysi s population; however, the available data do not establish the superio rity of the intravenous formulation over the oral form. Intravenous ca rnitine may have theoretical advantages in initiating treatment when h igh peak concentrations are required to facilitate carnitine reaching nonhepatic tissue sites or when oral carnitine therapy is not feasible due to poor tolerance or compliance. Although comparative trials are lacking, it is probable that oral therapy can be used for long-term ma intenance, regardless of which formulation was used to initiate therap y. The decision to use carnitine therapy, as well as the dose and rout e of administration, requires individualization based on the clinical status of the patient and the goals of therapy.