Several aspects of cross-cultural differences in attributions remain r
elatively unexplored, including the issue of different criteria for su
ccess and failure, different forms of achievement motivation, the like
lihood of making attributions, and different perceptions of causes on
the dimensions of controllability, stability, and locus. The present s
tudy solicited New Zealand (Pakeha/European descent) and Singaporean (
Chinese) students' attributions for their own success and failure in e
xaminations. Also assessed were the criteria of success and failure, t
he likelihood of obtaining success and failure, the importance of achi
eving success and failure, the relative likelihood of giving an attrib
ution for success or failure, and ratings of ten causes on the dimensi
ons of controllability locus, and stability. Differences between the c
ultures were obtained for several of these factors. These differences
are related to different values in the two cultures, and have implicat
ions for theories of attribution and achievement motivation.