M. Lamontagne et al., THE MONT-LAURIER, QUEBEC, EARTHQUAKE OF 19-OCTOBER-1990 AND ITS SEISMOTECTONIC ENVIRONMENT, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 84(5), 1994, pp. 1506-1522
On 19 October 1990 at 07:01 UT, a magnitude m(bLg) 5.0 earthquake occu
rred approximately 9 km southwest of Mont-Laurier, Quebec, Canada (lat
itude 46.47 degrees N and longitude 75.59 degrees W). This earthquake
is the largest to have occurred in the Western Quebec Seismic Zone sin
ce the 1944 magnitude 5.6 Cornwall-Massena earthquake. The Mont-Laurie
r earthquake was widely felt up to distances of 500 km and caused some
minor damage in the epicentral region [intensity Modified Mercalli (M
M) V]. During the week following the earthquake, a field survey record
ed 23 aftershocks (magnitudes were all less than M(L) 1.5). Analysis o
f the mainshock and its aftershocks indicates focal depths in the rang
e 10 to 12 km. Of the two east-west oriented nodal planes given by the
predominantly thrust mechanism of the mainshock, the steep northerly
dipping one probably represents the fault plane, as indicated by the t
rend of aftershock hypocenters. The last 10 yr of recording have confi
rmed that most western Quebec earthquakes, including the Mont-Laurier
earthquake, occur in a northwest-southeast-trending zone inside the Ce
ntral Metasedimentary (CM) Belt with most focal depths varying between
7 and 25 km. Although some northwest-trending structural features are
known, correlating these with the epicentral trend is premature. The
mid-crustal hypocentral depths of many earthquakes, the east-west tren
d of the fault plane of the Mont-Laurier earthquake, and variations in
regional focal mechanisms all suggest reactivation of deep structural
features, which may not have a surface expression. Inside the Central
Metasedimentary Belt, most earthquakes occur along the eastern side,
where the activity seems to correlate with the Labelle Shear Zone and
the Morin anorthosite body, which may act as a stress concentrator. Th
e western side of the activity does not end with the Central Metasedim
entary Belt, a fact that implies that even though the factors controll
ing seismicity lie predominantly within the Central Metasedimentary Be
lt, the adjacent geologic domains are also seismogenic.