Dp. Anhalt et al., PATTERNS OF CHANGES OF TUMOR TEMPERATURES DURING CLINICAL HYPERTHERMIA - IMPLICATIONS FOR TREATMENT PLANNING, EVALUATION AND CONTROL, International journal of hyperthermia, 11(3), 1995, pp. 425-436
The patterns of changes in tumour temperatures were studied at selecte
d times throughout 104 hyperthermia sessions. Temperature change patte
rns were analysed in the context of the known patterns of change of th
e applied power. First, of 69 extracranial treatments analysed, 74% in
dicated relatively flat temperatures at constant applied power during
a major portion of the treatment, thereby indicating that during that
time there were no major changes in any of the physical or physiologic
al tissue parameters which contribute to the ability of the tumour tis
sue to remove energy (Pattern 1). Second, after reaching an initial st
eady state, approximately 14% of these extracranial treatments showed
either steadily decreasing temperatures at constant power, or constant
temperatures at steadily increasing applied power, thereby indicating
that the tumour's ability to remove energy was steadily increasing in
lime following the initial steady state (Pattern 2). Finally, after r
eaching an initial steady state, the remaining 12% of these treatments
showed a pronounced decrease in temperature occurring about 10-20 min
into the treatment followed by increasing temperatures or levelling o
ff of temperatures at a higher value than the temperature minimum that
had occurred, all at constant applied power (Pattern 3). Of 35 brain
treatments analysed, 80% followed Pattern 1, 14% followed Pattern 2, a
nd 6% followed Pattern 3. Intratumoral heterogeneity was evident in so
me cases with approximately 44% of all treatments having at least one
individual temperature sensor change in a manner that did not follow t
he average direction of change when all sensors were combined. For sev
en patients with permanent probes, the patterns of change presented in
the first treatments were also observed during six out of seven of th
e second treatments. In addition, three out of the five patients who h
ad an evaluable third treatment showed a pattern of change during that
third treatment that was similar to the pattern observed in both trea
tment one and treatment two.