M. Poot et al., DISTINCT PATTERNS OF CELL-CYCLE DISTURBANCE ELICITED BY COMPOUNDS INTERFERING WITH DNA TOPOISOMERASE-I AND TOPOISOMERASE-II ACTIVITY, Experimental cell research, 218(1), 1995, pp. 326-330
DNA topoisomerases are enzymes governing the multitude of conformation
al changes DNA undergoes during the cell cycle. Several compounds are
likely to interfere with specific steps of the catalytic cycle of thes
e enzymes. Camptothecin arrests the activity of DNA topoisomerase I by
provoking the formation of a single-stranded DNA break with the enzym
e molecule covalently attached to the DNA. Exposure to m-AMSA arrests
DNA topoisomerase II by the formation of a ternary complex involving t
he drug, the enzyme, and DNA carrying a double-stranded break. Netrops
in, distamycin A, and berenil inhibit DNA topoisomerase-mediated relax
ation of supercoiled DNA by an as-yet unknown mechanism. Here, we anal
yze the cell cycle kinetic effects of exposure to camptothecin, m-AMSA
, netropsin, distamycin A, and berenil by using continuous bromodeoxyu
ridine labeling followed by bivariate Hoechst 33258/ethidium bromide f
low cytometry. Camptothecin elicits an accumulation of cells in all co
mpartments of the cell cycle, while exposure to m-AMSA leads mainly to
retention of cells in the G(0)/G(1) compartment and to accumulation i
n the Gz phase. Neither camptothecin nor m-AMSA shows a synergism with
bromodeoxyuridine incorporation into the DNA. These results point tow
ard distinct functions of the two DNA topoisomerases in the process of
cell cycle traverse. The compounds binding to the minor groove of DNA
interfere with all phases of the cell cycle, but with a relative emph
asis on the G(2) phase. Neither camptothecin nor m-AMSA exhibits a syn
ergistic effect in combination with berenil. Hence, at the level of pe
rturbed cell cycle kinetics a distinction can be made between compound
s provoking an abortive inhibition of the catalytic cycle of DNA topoi
somerases (e.g., camptothecin, m-AMSA) and those interfering with the
activity of the enzyme by a distinct mechanism. (C) 1995 Academic Pres
s, Inc.