Four experiments examined the attributional consequences of engaging i
n conservation-oriented behavior. Based an symbolic interactionist and
self-presentational theory, it was hypothesized that behaviors associ
ated with resource conservation would tend to affect the perceived sta
tus of the performer and would lead to systematic attributions regardi
ng the performer's identity. In the three initial experiments, each ma
nipulating a different conservation behavior, subjects were asked to j
udge the identity of a target person based on a description of the tar
get's activities. Results indicated that stereotypes regarding the ide
ntity of people who engaged in the manipulated conservation-oriented b
ehaviors were widely shared. Further, the performance of these particu
lar energy conservation behaviors was found to stigmatize the target b
y lowering the target's perceived status and by negatively influencing
other dimensions of identity. A final study explored the perceived ap
propriateness of engaging in particular conservationist activities giv
en specific self-presentational concerns. The data revealed considerab
le intersubject agreement as to the appropriateness of such behavior i
n situations in which the goal is to convey a specific image of the se
lf to a social audience. The research suggests that the self-presentat
ional connotations of conservation-oriented activities may be Importan
t determinants of their performance.