A variety of tumour marker tests are available for three major intende
d uses: screening, diagnosis, and monitoring. For each use, performanc
e characteristics need to be well established. The value of a marker d
epends heavily on two predominant performance parameters - sensitivity
and specificity. These parameters must be established with respect to
the intended clinical use of the marker. Therefore, it is important t
o balance the analytical/clinical sensitivity and the resultant claims
for the test. The FDA review and evaluation of a tumour marker test f
ocuses upon the intended use and the clinical utility of the marker. T
he sponsor must prove all specific claims. The data must support well-
designed scientific protocols and clinical studies[1]. Generally, a tu
mour marker test is evaluated based on its intended clinical use, epid
emiological sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence. A particular tum
our marker test will have higher predictive value when it is applied t
o a population with a higher prevalence of the type of cancer being st
udied. Clinical utility for screening use may be limited by low preval
ence [2].