Previous studies have found equivocal evidence for expectancy effects
on cognitive-motor performance. The effects of expectancy and alcohol
on a dual tracking reaction-time task analogous to some driving skills
, and on choice reaction-time, were studied in a balanced-placebo desi
gn (n=90). A dose of alcohol achieving 80 mg/100 ml (high dose) had la
rge effects on both tasks, but a low dose (40 mg/100 ml) had no signif
icant effects. Expecting alcohol led to subjects who received the high
hose performing significantly better on the primary tracking task tha
n subjects expecting placebo (but also receiving the high alcohol dose
). By contrast, on a secondary reaction-time task, subjects who had re
ceived placebo performed worse 100-130 minutes after drinking, if they
had expected alcohol. All groups felt more drunk than baseline and ex
pecting alcohol made subjects feel more able to perform, whatever drin
k they had received. The implications of these findings for the nature
of expectancy effects on performance and the relationship between exp
ectations and strategy are discussed.