On April 30, 1991, a cyclone of unusual intensity hit the coastline of
Bangladesh, causing over one hundred thousand deaths and widespread p
roperty damage. An international debate ensued over whether the disast
er was due to natural phenomena and should be addressed by relief meas
ures, or whether it was due to social, economic, and political factors
and should be addressed by structural change in society. This study e
xplores the dimensions of this debate by means of a content analysis o
f accounts of the cyclone by the Bangladesh media and government, and
by the international media and scholarly community. Bangladeshi accoun
ts of the cyclone emphasize its purported inevitability and natural or
igins. However, scholars maintain that while cyclones are inevitable,
disasters such as occurred in April 1998 are not: they are a function
of the historically increasing socioeconomic vulnerability of the Bang
ladesh population. According to this view, the ''natural disaster'' of
April 1991 could more accurately be called a ''social or political di
saster.'' The factor chiefly responsible for transforming natural disa
sters into sociopolitical disasters is occupation of hazardous areas.
The Bangladesh media and government suggest that the cyclone's impact
was worsened by the irrational behavior of individuals and the limited
resources of the nation. Non-Bangladeshi accounts focus instead on th
e poverty of individuals and the structural inequities of society, whi
ch compel people to live in hazardous areas. Bangladeshi accounts atte
mpted to link the cyclone to global warming and the greenhouse gas emi
ssions of the industrialized nations, thus shifting the focus from int
ernal problems of structure and equity to international problems of st
ructure and equity. Debates such as this promise to become more common
, as the global environment becomes increasingly ''post-natural'' and
the framing of relations between population and environment is increas
ingly contested.