Jf. Kraus et al., THE ACCURACY OF DEATH CERTIFICATES IN IDENTIFYING WORK-RELATED FATAL INJURIES, American journal of epidemiology, 141(10), 1995, pp. 973-979
Three national US agencies report on work-related fatal injuries, and
one uses the ''injury at work'' designation on the death certificate t
o identify and characterize these fatalities. The accuracy of the ''in
jury at work'' notation has not been validated. The authors used selec
ted external causes of death (from the International Classification of
Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical modification) that are highly like
ly to be work-related or not work-related as a standard to compare wit
h the California death certificate ''at work'' designation for the yea
rs 1979-1989. Data from the National Center for Health Statistics for
the years 1979-1984 were used to measure prevalence for purposes of de
termining the predictive value of a positive or negative work-related
notation on the death certificate. The sensitivity of the ''at work''
designation was 77.6%, with a specificity of over 99%. Sensitivity but
not specificity varied by age, sex, and specific external cause of de
ath. The predictive value positive of the ''at work'' designation was
about 60%, which suggests caution in using it for some epidemiologic p
urposes.