THE ACCURACY OF DEATH CERTIFICATES IN IDENTIFYING WORK-RELATED FATAL INJURIES

Citation
Jf. Kraus et al., THE ACCURACY OF DEATH CERTIFICATES IN IDENTIFYING WORK-RELATED FATAL INJURIES, American journal of epidemiology, 141(10), 1995, pp. 973-979
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
ISSN journal
00029262
Volume
141
Issue
10
Year of publication
1995
Pages
973 - 979
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9262(1995)141:10<973:TAODCI>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Three national US agencies report on work-related fatal injuries, and one uses the ''injury at work'' designation on the death certificate t o identify and characterize these fatalities. The accuracy of the ''in jury at work'' notation has not been validated. The authors used selec ted external causes of death (from the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical modification) that are highly like ly to be work-related or not work-related as a standard to compare wit h the California death certificate ''at work'' designation for the yea rs 1979-1989. Data from the National Center for Health Statistics for the years 1979-1984 were used to measure prevalence for purposes of de termining the predictive value of a positive or negative work-related notation on the death certificate. The sensitivity of the ''at work'' designation was 77.6%, with a specificity of over 99%. Sensitivity but not specificity varied by age, sex, and specific external cause of de ath. The predictive value positive of the ''at work'' designation was about 60%, which suggests caution in using it for some epidemiologic p urposes.