COMPARISON OF ELECTROMOTIVE DRUG ADMINISTRATION WITH KETOROLAC OR WITH PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH PAIN FROM RHEUMATIC DISEASE - A DOUBLE-MASKED STUDY

Citation
R. Saggini et al., COMPARISON OF ELECTROMOTIVE DRUG ADMINISTRATION WITH KETOROLAC OR WITH PLACEBO IN PATIENTS WITH PAIN FROM RHEUMATIC DISEASE - A DOUBLE-MASKED STUDY, Clinical therapeutics, 18(6), 1996, pp. 1169-1174
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
01492918
Volume
18
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1169 - 1174
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-2918(1996)18:6<1169:COEDAW>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of ketorolac compared with placebo when delivered by electromotive drug administration (EMD A) in patients with pain from rheumatic disease. In EMDA, or iontophor esis, a low-intensity electric current is applied over the skin to del iver medication into body tissues. Although EMDA has been used to trea t patients with various diseases, controlled studies are lacking in pa tients with rheumatic disease. This double-masked study included 60 pa tients (43 women and 17 men) aged 31 to 80 years with the following co nditions: 12, epicondylitis; 30, scapulohumeral periarthritis; 10, gon algia; and 8, metatarsalgia. They were divided randomly by a physician into 2 groups of 30 patients each for 5 sessions of active treatment (30 mg of ketorolac) or placebo (5 mL of normal saline). Treatment too k place every other day for 20 minutes. Immediately before and after t he five treatment sessions and 7 days after treatment ended, both pati ent and physician measured the degree of pain using a categoric scale (no pain, slight pain, intermediate pain, strong pain, and very strong pain) and evaluated pain intensity using the Scott and Huskisson Visu al Analogue Scale (VAS). Seven days after treatment ended, both physic ian and patient judged the result of treatment using a second categori c scale (no improvement or intermediate, good, or very good result), B oth ketorolac and placebo provided immediate, significant pain relief when delivered by EMDA, but only those patients receiving ketorolac ex perienced a further reduction in pain 7 days after treatment; those re ceiving placebo experienced a slight increase in pain. VAS values diff ered significantly between the two groups. Poor results (no improvemen t) were significantly higher in the placebo-treated group, while good results were significantly higher in the ketorolac-treated group. No p atient reported any adverse effects during treatment. This study demon strates that ketorolac relieves pain when delivered by EMDA and offers longer-lasting pain relief than does placebo.