DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF SMALL (19MM) BILEAFLET AND PERICARDIAL HEART-VALVE PROSTHESES IN AORTIC POSITION

Citation
Jr. Gonzalezjuanatey et al., DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF SMALL (19MM) BILEAFLET AND PERICARDIAL HEART-VALVE PROSTHESES IN AORTIC POSITION, Scandinavian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 29(1), 1995, pp. 29-35
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00365580
Volume
29
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
29 - 35
Database
ISI
SICI code
0036-5580(1995)29:1<29:DCOS(B>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
The resting haemodynamics of five types of small (19 mm) aortic valve prosthesis (2 bileaflet, 3 pericardial) were evaluated with Doppler ec hocardiography in 43 patients. Two received St Jude Medical and six Ca rboMedics bileaflet valves and 35 were given bioprostheses-16 Ionescu- Shiley, four Mitroflow and 15 Labcor-Santiago. No significant differen ces in peak or mean transvalvular pressure drop or in effective valve area were found between the bileaflet and the pericardial valves or am ong the three types of bioprosthesis. All but one of the bileaflet pro stheses showed a characteristic regurgitation pattern, with two latera l and one central jet, and 16 (46%) of the bioprostheses showed centra l regurgitation, but in no case were these jets haemodynamically signi ficant. Thus the 19 mm bileaflet and the studied pericardial prosthese s all have satisfactory resting haemodynamics, and all are suitable fo r implanting in small aortic roots.