Mh. Huber et al., PHASE-II STUDY OF CARBOPLATIN AND CONTINUOUS-INFUSION BLEOMYCIN FOLLOWED BY CISPLATIN AND 5-FLUOROURACIL IN RECURRENT HEAD AND NECK-CANCER, Annals of oncology, 6(1), 1995, pp. 83-85
Background: Recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is
poorly responsive to most chemotherapy regimens. Carboplatin and bleom
ycin are effective single agents with non-overlapping toxicity; theref
ore, we sought to explore the efficacy of this regimen in a phase II s
tudy. In the second stage of the study, patients who did not respond t
o carboplatin and bleomycin were given treatment with cisplatin and 5-
fluorouracil (5-FU). Patients and methods: Patients with recurrent squ
amous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with carboplati
n 400 mg/m(2) followed by bleomycin 15 units intravenously as a contin
uous infusion for 4 days. Patients with no tumor response after 3 cycl
es of carboplatin and bleomycin were crossed-over to receive cisplatin
100 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2)/day continuous infusion for 5 days.
Results: Among the 20 carboplatin-bleomycin patients evaluable for to
xicity, no cases of grade 4 granulocytopenia were reported and grade 3
or 4 thrombocytopenia developed in only three patients. Three partial
responses occurred among the 19 patients (16%) [95% C.I. 0% to 32%] e
valuable for response to carboplatin-bleomycin. None of the II patient
s crossed-over to cisplatin and 5-FU had a major response. Conclusion:
The combination of carboplatin and bleomycin is well tolerated in pat
ients with recurrent head and neck cancer, but the activity does not a
ppear to be superior to the activity of either agent alone. Patients w
ho did not respond to carboplatin and bleomycin were also resistant to
the cisplatin and 5-FU regimen.