C. Martinez et Sg. Ball, COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF RAMIPRIL THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH CLINICAL-EVIDENCE OF HEART-FAILURE AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, British journal of clinical practice, 1995, pp. 26-32
The incremental cost-effectiveness of ramipril treatment compared with
conventional treatment of patients with clinical evidence of heart fa
ilure after acute myocardial infarction was estimated for the UK. Effe
ctiveness was based on differential survival and defined as life-years
gained using original patient data from the Acute Infarction Ramipril
Efficacy Study (AIRE Study). The major cost identified for the ramipr
il treatment strategy was the cost of the drug, which was offset by a
reduction in cost from lower hospitalisation rates. These treatment co
sts were estimated from the prescription of ramipril and the hospitali
sation rates in the AIRE Study and secondary sources. Cost-effectivene
ss, in terms of costs required for each life-year gained, was calculat
ed over three treatment periods (1, 2, and 3.8 years). Future costs an
d effectiveness were discounted at 6% per year. The cost-effectiveness
from treatment with ramipril for heart failure after acute myocardial
infarction ranged from pound 148 to pound 426 per life-year gained, d
epending on the duration of treatment. Ramipril treatment offers a sub
stantial survival benefit to patients, Its cost-effectiveness compares
favourably with that of chronic heart failure treatment and other com
mon medical therapies.