Ma. Anderson et al., AN EVALUATION OF INFANT GROWTH - THE USE AND INTERPRETATION OF ANTHROPOMETRY IN INFANTS, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 73(2), 1995, pp. 165-174
In reviewing the growth of infants who live under favourable condition
s and are fed according to WHO feeding recommendations, the Working Gr
oup found significant differences between the growth patterns of these
infants and the patterns reflected in the NCHS-WHO international refe
rence. Given the short- and long-term consequences of growth failure,
and the dangers of both the premature introduction of complementary fo
ods and their undue delay - described as the ''weanling's dilemma'', t
he Working Group concluded that use of the current NCHS-WHO reference
appears to accentuate the difficulty of avoiding these extremes rather
than to help ensure optimal infant nutritional management. The Workin
g Group identified the following requirements: (a) a new reference whi
ch will enhance the nutritional management of infants; (b) the referen
ce population should reflect current health recommendations because of
the frequent use of such reference data as standards; (c) evaluation,
in a broad range of settings, of the practical utility of using refer
ence data based on infants for whom the WHO feeding recommendations ar
e being followed; (d) close investigation of the effects of different
complementary foods on the growth of infants who are being fed accordi
ng to the WHO recommendations; (e) criteria for evaluating abnormal gr
owth patterns, (f) research for identifying proxy measures for length;
and (g) evaluation of reference data based on other anthropometric me
asurements, such as skinfold thickness and arm and head circumferences
.