Ak. Wagner et al., ADVANCES IN METHODS FOR ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF EPILEPSY AND ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUG-THERAPY ON PATIENTS HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE, Quality of life research, 4(2), 1995, pp. 115-134
We studied 31 previously validated and newly developed generic and epi
lepsy-specific scales to evaluate their usefulness for assessing the i
mpact of epilepsy and anti-epileptic drug (AED) therapy on health-rela
ted quality of life (HRQOL). Included were the MOS SF-36 Health Survey
, additional measures of mental health, cognition, epilepsy-specific p
erception of control, behavioural problems, distress, worries and expe
riences, the Liverpool Epilepsy Impact and Seizure Severity scales, an
d a patient-completed symptom checklist. Questionnaires were completed
twice by 136 patients on AED therapy in a multicentre study in the UK
. Validity was assessed in relation to disease severity, defined as ti
me since last seizure, and to patient-reported symptoms. Statistical a
nalyses to estimate the contribution of HRQOL information of each scal
e relative to that of others were conducted. The 171-item questionnair
e could be completed by out-patients with epilepsy with good data qual
ity. With few exceptions, generic and epilepsy-specific measures satis
fied psychometric tests of hypothesized item groupings and scale score
reliability (internal consistency and test-retest reliability) and di
fferentiated well between groups of patients differing in time since l
ast seizure and in symptom impact, regardless of time since last seizu
re. However, scales differed widely in their validity in discriminatin
g between groups of patients known to differ clinically. The SF-36 Rol
e Physical scale best discriminated among groups differing in disease
severity. The epilepsy-specific Mastery, Impact, Experience, Worry, Di
stress, and Agitation scales were among the 10 best measures in discri
minating among groups differing in disease severity. Generic measures,
especially measures of social and role functioning and mental health,
were best at differentiating groups of patients differing in symptom
impact. Recommendations are offered for concepts and specific scales m
ost likely to be useful in future studies of the HRQOL burden of epile
psy and the HRQOL benefits of AED therapy.