This paper begins with a critical review of studies which have examine
d the effects of caring on health. Most are shown to suffer from defec
ts in sampling and design, so that the evidence for detrimental effect
s is suggestive rather than conclusive. The substantive part of the pa
per then utilizes data on a cohort of 55-year-olds to compare the heal
th of carers with the health of non-carers and to examine changes in c
aring and health over a 3-year period. The comparison yields no system
atic evidence of the deleterious effects of caring on health; indeed,
if there is a tendency in the accumulated data, it is in the opposite
direction i.e. that carers report better health and functioning than n
on-carers. It is suggested that part of the explanation relates to sel
ection and self-selection and the longitudinal data reveals high volat
ility in caring status, even over a short time period. The paper goes
on to examine sub-groups of carers considered to be at greater risk. T
here is no evidence that their health is compromised but the authors a
cknowledge weaknesses in the data and argue for a specially designed s
tudy. The paper concludes with a discussion of the findings and their
implications for research, policy and practice.