Exogenous surfactant administration is currently being investigated in
patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Several
animal studies and recent clinical experience suggest that this thera
py has promise. Currently, the optimal method of delivery is unknown.
Both instillation of large doses of exogenous surfactant as well as ae
rosolization with small quantities of surfactant deposited in lung tis
sue have been evaluated. Both methods of delivery have significantly i
mproved lung function in animal models of lung injury and are currentl
y being evaluated in multicenter clinical trials. From the animal mode
l of lung injury in which injury was induced by repetitive saline lung
ravage, it has been shown that aerosolized surfactant was, in some ca
ses, superior to instilled surfactant. With improvements in technology
resulting in increased aerosolized surfactant deposition within lung
tissue, consistent improvements in physiologic parameters have been sh
own suggesting a dose-response phenomenon. On the other hand, the effi
cacy of aerosolized exogenous surfactant is dependent on the underlyin
g pattern of lung injury. In situations where the injury is nonuniform
in distribution, aerosolized surfactant has been shown to be ineffect
ive in animal models, Finally, different exogenous surfactant preparat
ions currently available may have variable efficacy depending on the m
ode of delivery, In summary, it is evident that various factors influe
nce the efficacy of aerosolized exogenous surfactant and these factors
will have to be investigated before optimal surfactant treatment stra
tegies are obtained. Whatever the final treatment strategy chosen, it
must be easy to use and reliable. With surfactant alterations document
ed in other lung diseases including pneumonia and asthma, delivery of
aerosolized exogenous surfactant will potentially have a greater role
in our therapeutic approach to these diseases.