PURPOSE: Fecal electrolytes and organic anion concentrations are alter
ed in ulcerative colitis, presumably reflecting changes in colon epith
elial transport. Information of mucosal absorption of butyrate in acti
ve ulcerative proctosigmoiditis is not available. METHODS: Dialysis ba
gs containing 70 mmol/liter of butyrate in an isotonic electrolyte sol
ution were placed in the rectum for 30 minutes. Net absorption or secr
etion rates of butyrate, lactate, and electrolytes were determined in
the rectum of 12 patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC) and in 1
0 patients with quiescent UC and then compared with 10 healthy control
s. RESULTS: Net flux rates demonstrated a considerable absorption of b
utyrate in patients with active inflammation of 7.5 +/- 0.4 mu mol/cm(
2)/h and quiescent colitis of 6.6 +/- 0.4 mu mol/cm(2)/h, equal to abs
orption in healthy controls of 6.3 +/- 0.5 mu mol/cm(2)/h, P = 0.12. D
espite normal butyrate absorption, sodium absorption was compromised i
n active ulcerative colitis (11.5 +/- 1.4 mu mol/cm(2)/h) compared wit
h quiescent (15.4 +/- 1.0 mu mol/cm(2)/h) and controls (18.7 +/- 0.8 m
u mol/cm(2)/h) (P = 0.0006). Mucosal secretion of L-lactate was minima
l in both healthy controls and quiescent UC but significantly increase
d in patients with proctosigmoiditis (0.2 +/- 0.1 mu mol/cm(2)/h, 0.2
+/- 0.1 mu mol/cm(2)/h vs. 0.9 +/- 0.2 mu mol/cm(2)/h; P = 0.0001). Ap
pearance of D-lactate was negligible in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS:
This study demonstrates that rectal butyrate absorption is normal in
UC, and it follows that butyrate supplied in enemas can be expected to
be absorbed. The inflamed colonic mucosa secretes L-lactate, and the
increased fecal lactate concentrations can be explained by mucosal ori
gin of lactate.