Jam. Miguel et al., CLINICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN A GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT AND A COMPOSITE FOR DIRECT BONDING OF ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics, 107(5), 1995, pp. 484-487
The clinical performance of a glass ionomer cement for direct bonding
of orthodontic brackets was compared with a composite resin routinely
used in this procedure. Brackets were bonded, using both materials, in
alternate quadrants of 16 patients of the Orthodontic Clinic of the S
tate University of Rio de Janeiro. A total of 225 teeth, 112 in the gl
ass ionomer cement group and 113 in the composite group, were tested.
Bond failure frequencies were recorded for 12 months, and chi-square s
tatistical test was carried out comparing the failure rates of the mat
erials, The composite showed a statistically significant lower failure
rate (7.96%) than the glass ionomer cement (50.89%), regardless of th
e dental arch tested. Although the glass ionomer cement presents impor
tant properties not observed in the composite, it is necessary to incr
ease its cohesive strength to permit its clinical use for direct bondi
ng of orthodontic brackets.