USE OF PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS ARTERIOVENOUS HEMOFILTRATION, AND CONTINUOUS ARTERIOVENOUS HEMODIAFILTRATION FOR REMOVAL OF AMMONIUM-CHLORIDE AND GLUTAMINE IN RABBITS
Ds. Semama et al., USE OF PERITONEAL-DIALYSIS, CONTINUOUS ARTERIOVENOUS HEMOFILTRATION, AND CONTINUOUS ARTERIOVENOUS HEMODIAFILTRATION FOR REMOVAL OF AMMONIUM-CHLORIDE AND GLUTAMINE IN RABBITS, The Journal of pediatrics, 126(5), 1995, pp. 742-746
Objective: We compared the ability of peritoneal dialysis, hemofiltrat
ion, and continuous hemodiafiltration to remove infused ammonium chlor
ide. Study design: Anesthetized adult rabbits received an intravenous
infusion of ammonium chloride, Two methods of removal of ammonium chlo
ride were performed in each animal and compared. In group 1 (n = 6), p
eritoneal dialysis (dialysate = 75 ml . kg(-1)) and continuous arterio
venous hemofiltration (CAVH) with a polysulfone 800 cm(2) hemofilter (
Minifilter Plus; Amicon Division, W. R. Grace and Co., Danvers, Mass.)
were simultaneously performed for 40 minutes. In group 2 (n = 6), per
itoneal dialysis and continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration (CAVHD
) (dialysate flow = 1000 ml . hr(-1)) were simultaneous performed for
40 minutes. In group 3 (n = 6), CAVH and CAVHD were performed successi
vely in random order for 30 minutes each. Results: Animals had high an
d stable ammonium chloride and glutamine plasma levels during the expe
rimental procedure. No significant difference in ammonium chloride cle
arance was observed between PD and CAVH (group 1), In comparison with
PD or CAVH, CAVHD resulted in significantly higher clearances of ammon
ium chloride (40% +/- 10% vs 96% +/- 34%, respectively) and of glutami
ne (195% +/- 17% vs 77% +/- 25%, respectively). Conclusion: The overal
l results indicate that CAVHD should be considered for hyperammonemia
when peritoneal dialysis is indicated but unfeasible or inefficient.