M. Hauser et al., BILATERAL SOLID MULTIFOCAL INTRARENAL AND PERIRENAL LESIONS - DIFFERENTIATION WITH ULTRASONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING, Clinical Radiology, 50(5), 1995, pp. 288-294
The differential diagnosis of bilateral solid multifocal intrarenal an
d perirenal lesions includes neoplastic, infiltrative, inflammatory, a
nd vascular disorders, In a retrospective study 560 solid lesions were
examined with cross-sectional imaging modalities (computed tomography
(CT), ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)). Th
e results suggest that focal inflammatory disease can often be recogni
zed because the lesions are poorly defined and may show a rather chara
cteristic peripheral rim enhancement following the administration of i
ntravenous contrast. Angiomyolipomas can be accurately diagnosed with
CT, MR and US imaging, Because of their unique histomorphology they sh
ow fat-equivalent attenuation values at CT, hyperintense signal on T1
and hypointense signal on T2-weighted MR images, and appear homogeneou
s and hyperechoic with smooth margins at US, By the radiologic appeara
nce alone renal metastases cannot be distinguished from lymphoma or re
nal cell carcinoma or adenoma, However, when multiple bilateral solid
intrarenal or perirenal lesions are found with synchronous metastatic
involvement of other organs or occur in the setting of a known primary
tumour, the diagnosis of renal metastases Is very likely. In the abse
nce of these additional findings, malignant lymphoma has a higher prob
ability, Infiltration of perinephric fat and thickening of the perinep
hric fascia may occur in inflammatory disease and lymphoma, CT remains
the most suitable imaging technique to screen for these additional pe
rirenal and extrarenal findings because of ready availability and rela
tively short scanning time as compared to MR imaging.