Sk. Gupta et al., COMPARISON OF THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF 2 NICOTINE TRANSDERMAL SYSTEMS - NICODERM AND HABITROL, Journal of clinical pharmacology, 35(5), 1995, pp. 493-498
This randomized, crossover study compared the nicotine and cotinine ph
armacokinetic parameters and plasma concentration profiles of two diff
erent nicotine transdermal products: Nicoderm (Alza, Pale Alto, CA; an
d Marion Merrell Dow, Kansas City, MO) and Habitrol (Basel Pharmaceuti
cals, Summit, ND. The two treatments were randomly assigned to each of
24 male smokers and worn for 24 hours each day for 5 days, with a B-d
ay washout between treatments. Plasma nicotine and cotinine concentrat
ions were measured on day 1 and day 5 of each treatment. Mean delivere
d dose differed significantly between products, and the two products w
ere not bioequivalent. The Nicoderm system provided higher mean plasma
nicotine concentrations, particularly during the first 8 hours after
system application. The mean steady state C-max, AUC, and degree of fl
uctuation (DF) values were significantly greater for the Nicoderm syst
em than for Habitrol. The mean nicotine t(max) value for the Nicoderm
system was significantly shorter (P <.001) than that for Habitrol (2.7
versus 8.6 hours). Steady state cotinine AUC values and plasma concen
trations were significantly lower for Habitrol than for the Nicoderm s
ystem. The incidence of adverse events was similar for both products.