The coverage dependence of electron-energy loss intensity (EELS) and o
f the frequency of the O-Ag(110) stretching vibration are re-examined
and compared with other EELS and infrared reflection absorption spectr
oscopy (IRAS) data. The analysis of the EELS intensity in our experime
nt yields a charge transfer q=0.51+/-0.03 e(-), which compares well wi
th independent EELS estimates but is at variance with the much smaller
IRAS value reported by Peng and Reutt-Robey [Surf. Sci. 336 (1995) L7
55]. Our value can account for most of the observed frequency shift wi
th coverage, indicating that no chemical shift occurs; in contrast wit
h the recent theory of Schimizu and Tsukada [Surf. Sci. 295 (1993) L10
17], the opposite conclusion would be supported by IRAS. The (surprisi
ng) inconsistency of EELS in dipole scattering and IRAS could be indic
ative that the physical basis of the two spectroscopies is not unique,
as assumed so far.